JACKSON, Miss. — Some House members want to ban Mississippi school history courses from promoting “any partisan agenda or philosophy.”
Sponsored by House Speaker Philip Gunn, R-Clinton, the measure is supposed to keep history teachers or textbooks from indoctrinating students according to a particular partisan viewpoint.
“We’re trying to protect the history of our nation in its purest form,” said House Education Committee Chairman John Moore, R-Brandon.
Great. Now who’s going to determine what constitutes the promotion of a “partisan agenda or philosophy,” and how do they go about enforcing it? What would be the penalty for indoctrinating students—a fine, prison time, community service, a stint in a re-education camp?
The measure says in part that “public school history courses may not promote any partisan agenda or philosophy and may not be revised for the purpose of significantly changing generally accepted history to create a bias toward an ideological position.” The bill moves forward to the full House after being approved Monday by the House Education Committee on a 10-5 vote.
How does a teacher “significantly change generally accepted history to create a bias toward an intellectual position,” I wonder? By informing students that the Soviet Union won the Cold War, or that the Constitution mandates a belief in God for all elected officials?
Oh, and get this. The guy who’s sponsoring the legislation
said it’s a reaction to Texas disputes over what should be included in textbooks that climaxed in 2010. He said he’s not aware of any similar problem that currently exists in Mississippi.
If it’s not a problem, then why in the name of all the deities on Olympus is the legislature fooling with it?
Let me suggest that for a state consistently ranked at or near the very bottom in national assessments of education, biased history teachers should be the least of your worries.