Blain Roberts and Ethan Kytle call for a national monument to slavery in an op-ed for The New York Times:
White Americans have long used monuments to propagate a flawed understanding of slavery and its role in the Civil War. When Charlestonians raised a memorial to the South Carolina statesman John C. Calhoun in 1896, they praised his dedication to truth, justice and the Constitution — ignoring his devotion to slavery, which he famously called “a positive good.”
Hundreds of similar monuments convinced generations of white Southerners, and others, that the Confederacy had gone to war to defend states’ rights, liberty and the Southern way of life. Anything but slavery.
Rather than relegating slavery to the margins of memory, we must place it front and center. Decades ago, scholars demolished claims that slavery did not cause the Civil War and debunked fairy tales about faithful slaves and doting masters. New research has gone further, exposing how American capitalism and democracy — once thought to be antithetical to slavery — emerged hand-in-hand with it.
Our nation’s capital is replete with memorials to presidents and veterans. Why not raise a slave monument alongside them? Congress actually entertained the idea in 2003, when the National Slave Memorial Act was introduced, but ultimately authorized the Smithsonian Museum of African American History and Culture instead.
There seem to be two impulses at work here, one commemorative and the other pedagogical. I think a national monument to slavery would only address the former.
Monuments are great if you want to commemorate and pay tribute. They constitute a visible, public statement about what a community thinks is important about its past.
As educational devices, though, monuments aren’t exactly the most effective instruments. If the aim is to counter mythical Lost Cause narratives or to propagate knowledge about the links between slavery, democracy, and capitalism, then the sort of sustained and serious public history effort we can expect from the NMAAHC will do far, far more good than a memorial on the National Mall.
I hasten to add that I don’t think a national slavery monument is a bad idea. I just don’t think it would address the issues regarding public understanding of the history of slavery that Roberts and Kytle have identified.