Ever dreamed of the chance to study history with a guy who thinks the Dead Sea Scrolls are remnants of texts that Constantine suppressed, that Native Americans carved Hebrew inscriptions, and that Parson Weems is a reliable source of information on George Washington?
Well, if you’re between the ages of 18 and 25, you—yes, friend, YOU!—are eligible for a two-week internship at Beck’s Mercury One library.
You’ll have to apply first, of course. They’re not just taking any Tom, Dick, or Harry from off the street. But if you make the cut and fork over $375, you get access to Beck’s collection of original documents and “the opportunity to gain a wealth of knowledge from our speakers and guest lecturers.”
While you’re there, maybe David Barton will sign your copy of the book his publisher recalled. Start getting those CVs ready!
America’s favorite pseudohistorian now has his own show on the three-ring circus that is the Trinity Broadcasting Network. That’s a formula for comedy gold—not as much as all that gilding on TBN’s sets, perhaps, but still quite a bit.
He’ll be in good company over there. TBN evidently has a thing for self-appointed experts with dubious credentials. One of their shows used to feature would-be creation scientist Carl Baugh, whose claims are so fatuous that even his fellow young Earth creationists have denounced him.
Barton’s apparent immunity from criticism never ceases to amaze me. You’d think a guy who has been shown to be wrong as much as he has would eventually lose a little credibility. I suppose when the criticism is coming from “a few dedicated liberal individuals,” you can afford to shrug it off.
Back when Thomas Nelson withdrew David Barton’s The Jefferson Lies from publication, Barton claimed that Simon & Schuster would release a new edition in 2013. Whatever arrangement he thought he had with S&S must have fallen through, because it never happened.
Two years on, it looks like he’s finally found somebody to reissue it: WND Books, the publishing arm of WorldNetDaily.
If the PR is any indication, it seems that Barton and his associates, like the French monarchists before them, have learned nothing and forgotten nothing:
Despite the wildly popular success of the original hardcover edition, a few dedicated liberal individuals campaigned to discredit Barton’s scholarship and credibility, but to no avail.
Wait, to no avail? Dude, they found so many errors and misrepresentations that the original publisher pulled it from circulation. That’s kind of why you’re writing this ad copy for a new edition in the first place, remember?
Nice try with the circumstantial ad hominem, too. “A few dedicated liberal individuals” sounds so much better than “numerous historians and evangelical commentators.”
I will say, however, that the new cover looks a lot sharper than the old one, so it’s got that going for it.
(Hat tip: Warren Throckmorton)
Some upstanding citizens are trying to convince David Barton to run for the Senate. If it means he won’t have as much time to write history books, I’d be happy to make a small campaign contribution.
I believed in Harvey Dent, and I believe in David Barton.
Glenn Beck hosted an exhibit of historical artifacts called the “Independence Through History Museum” at the Grand American Hotel in Salt Lake City over the July 4th weekend. The museum was only one part of Beck’s “Man in the Moon” event, which included conferences, lectures, and a live performance that (as far as I can determine) was an attempt to combine historical pageantry with Cirque du Soleil.
More info here and here. Note that the exhibit featured Arnold Friberg’s painting of Washington praying in the snow at Valley Forge. Since it’s doubtful the incident in the painting ever happened, it’s highly fitting that David Barton helped select the items to be displayed.
David Barton recently responded to Gregg Frazer’s critique of his Jefferson book in WORLD Magazine:
Throckmorton’s original assault on my book managed to avoid its major points and instead criticize minor and even obscure facts, and this new attack by Frazer seems to suggest that this “debate” may become a never-ending discussion over less and less. With so many important cultural battles that desperately need our focused attention, it seems a misuse of time and energy to continue arguing over relatively inconsequential points with those who profess to hold the same common Christian values, so I will now resume my efforts attempting to beat back the secularist progressive movement that wrongly invokes Jefferson in their efforts to expunge any presence of faith from the public square.
I found this response interesting for two reasons. First, I think Barton is understating both the number and the seriousness of the issues his critics have raised. There comes a point where so many errors and misinterpretations accumulate that it’s not a matter of a few tiny nicks, but something more like the old Chinese punishment of death by a thousand cuts.
Second, what to make of Barton’s statement that defending his work against fellow believers is a misuse of time and energy? Does this mean he’ll only be responding to “secularist” critiques from now on? It almost comes across as a tacit admission that his historical writing is merely ammo for the culture war, and that he’s not really interested in teaching history for its own sake.
Whenever Glenn Beck and David Barton get together to talk about history, you know you’re in for a show.
Check out this conversation they had about the movie Lincoln. Beck asks Barton about the film’s accuracy, and Barton claims that, contrary to what the film shows, the Thirteenth Amendment passed Congress easily as a “slam dunk” and without all the wheeling and dealing.
In reality, the vote in the HOR was anything but a “slam dunk.” Approval of a proposed constitutional amendment requires a two-thirds majority, not a simple one, and the Thirteenth Amendment just barely passed. A mere handful of additional nays, and it wouldn’t have.
Barton’s supporters are always assuring us that he’s an expert in matters constitutional and historical; he does know how new amendments get added to the Constitution, right?
As for the “wheeling and dealing,” Lincoln’s administration did, in fact, put quite a bit of pressure congressmen to support the amendment. The exact nature and extent of that pressure is a matter of some uncertainty (for obvious reasons, it’s not the sort of thing that leaves a paper trail), but that Lincoln was more heavily involved in this congressional matter than was usual for him is pretty well established.