America’s favorite pseudohistorian now has his own show on the three-ring circus that is the Trinity Broadcasting Network. That’s a formula for comedy gold—not as much as all that gilding on TBN’s sets, perhaps, but still quite a bit.
He’ll be in good company over there. TBN evidently has a thing for self-appointed experts with dubious credentials. One of their shows used to feature would-be creation scientist Carl Baugh, whose claims are so fatuous that even his fellow young Earth creationists have denounced him.
Barton’s apparent immunity from criticism never ceases to amaze me. You’d think a guy who has been shown to be wrong as much as he has would eventually lose a little credibility. I suppose when the criticism is coming from “a few dedicated liberal individuals,” you can afford to shrug it off.
Back when Thomas Nelson withdrew David Barton’s The Jefferson Lies from publication, Barton claimed that Simon & Schuster would release a new edition in 2013. Whatever arrangement he thought he had with S&S must have fallen through, because it never happened.
Two years on, it looks like he’s finally found somebody to reissue it: WND Books, the publishing arm of WorldNetDaily.
If the PR is any indication, it seems that Barton and his associates, like the French monarchists before them, have learned nothing and forgotten nothing:
Despite the wildly popular success of the original hardcover edition, a few dedicated liberal individuals campaigned to discredit Barton’s scholarship and credibility, but to no avail.
Wait, to no avail? Dude, they found so many errors and misrepresentations that the original publisher pulled it from circulation. That’s kind of why you’re writing this ad copy for a new edition in the first place, remember?
Nice try with the circumstantial ad hominem, too. “A few dedicated liberal individuals” sounds so much better than “numerous historians and evangelical commentators.”
I will say, however, that the new cover looks a lot sharper than the old one, so it’s got that going for it.
(Hat tip: Warren Throckmorton)
Here’s a really great opportunity for those of you interested in the Civil War and the history of American religion. Dr. Mark Noll is coming to the University of Tennessee this month to deliver the Charles Jackson Lecture. His topic is “The Bible and the Civil War: Before, During, and After.”
There aren’t many people in the historiography of religion or the realm of evangelical scholarship that cast a longer shadow than Noll. His many books include America’s God: From Jonathan Edwards to Abraham Lincoln, The Rise of Evangelicalism: The Age of Edwards, Whitefield and the Wesleys, A History of Christianity in the United States and Canada, Jesus Christ and the Life of the Mind, The Scandal of the Evangelical Mind, and the forthcoming In the Beginning Was the Word: The Bible in American Public Life, 1492-1783. He is Francis A. MacAnaney Professor of History at the University of Notre Dame, a member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, and a recipient of the National Humanities Medal.
The 2015 Jackson Lecture is on Oct. 21 at 5:00 P.M. in UT’s Alumni Memorial Building, Room 210. It’s free and open to anybody, so come by if you’re in the Knoxville area.
Cross-posted to the blog of the Abraham Lincoln Institute for the Study of Leadership and Public Policy
Lincoln Memorial University and the Abraham Lincoln Library and Museum will host the fourth “War in the Mountains” symposium April 17-18 as part of the ongoing commemoration of the Civil War Sesquicentennial. This event is free, but registration is required by April 9 due to limited seating.
The theme for this year’s symposium is “Religion, Death, Martyrdom, and the Civil War.”
Warren Greer, Director of of the Kentucky Lincoln Heritage Trail: “Action and Reaction: How Enlightenment Ideals Influenced
American Religion from the Great Awakening through the
- Dr. Michael Toomey, Associate Professor of History at Lincoln Memorial University: “Under Fire: Lincoln’s Religion and the Civil War”
- Dr. Earl Hess, Stewart W. McClelland Chair in History, Lincoln Memorial University: “Arguing Over the Civil War Death Toll: Does it Really Matter?”
- Dr. George Rable, Charles G. Summersell Chair in Southern History, University of Alabama: “God as General: Was There a Religious History of the American Civil War?”
This event also features a Q&A session, tours of the Abraham Lincoln Library and Museum vault, and a book signing by the speakers. The sessions will be held in LMU’s Hamilton Math & Science Building, Room 100.
To register or for more information, call the museum at (423) 869-6235 or e-mail Carol Campbell at email@example.com. The first 150 registrants will receive a free gift.
David Barton recently responded to Gregg Frazer’s critique of his Jefferson book in WORLD Magazine:
Throckmorton’s original assault on my book managed to avoid its major points and instead criticize minor and even obscure facts, and this new attack by Frazer seems to suggest that this “debate” may become a never-ending discussion over less and less. With so many important cultural battles that desperately need our focused attention, it seems a misuse of time and energy to continue arguing over relatively inconsequential points with those who profess to hold the same common Christian values, so I will now resume my efforts attempting to beat back the secularist progressive movement that wrongly invokes Jefferson in their efforts to expunge any presence of faith from the public square.
I found this response interesting for two reasons. First, I think Barton is understating both the number and the seriousness of the issues his critics have raised. There comes a point where so many errors and misinterpretations accumulate that it’s not a matter of a few tiny nicks, but something more like the old Chinese punishment of death by a thousand cuts.
Second, what to make of Barton’s statement that defending his work against fellow believers is a misuse of time and energy? Does this mean he’ll only be responding to “secularist” critiques from now on? It almost comes across as a tacit admission that his historical writing is merely ammo for the culture war, and that he’s not really interested in teaching history for its own sake.
Today is the anniversary of an event that is familiar to students of American religious history, one which has come to be called the “Great Disappointment.”
No, not that one. I mean the Great Disappointment of 1844, in which, contrary to the expectations of thousands of Millerites, the world did not come to an end. You’d think people who build their reputations on a painstaking study of Scripture would eventually get around to reading Matthew 24:36, but it’s one of the most widely ignored verses in the Bible, right up there with Matt. 5:44, Matt. 5:28, 1 Cor. 6:7, and the last part of Leviticus 19:19.
On a different note, if you’d like information about a battlefield preservation opportunity, click here.
In 1663 Connecticut authorities hanged Mary Barnes for witchcraft, and now her great-great-great-great-great-great-great-granddaughter wants her ancestor’s name cleared, along with those of ten other executed witches. It must be a lot harder to live down a family scandal in Connecticut. “Uh-oh, Mildred, here comes that woman whose seventh grandmother was hanged for being a witch. I hope she doesn’t try to sit next to us.”
From The Witch of Salem, by Freeland A. Carter via Wikimedia Commons
This effort has attracted the attention of the Connecticut Wiccan & Pagan Network (suggested motto: “Loki is Our Homeboy”), which wants a proclamation from the governor. They’re sending postcards—I’m not making this up—with the message, “I am a Pagan/Witch and I vote. Clear the names of Connecticut’s eleven accused and executed witches.”
I’m assuming the descendants of the condemned witches want their ancestors declared innocent. If that’s the case, it doesn’t really seem helpful to have the witch/pagan lobby involved. If the point is that grandma was executed for something she didn’t do, wouldn’t you want to keep people who affirm the okayness of what she was accused of doing from appropriating her as a symbol?
Oh, and if you’re thinking that Connecticut was still a colony when it was executing witches and the aggrieved parties should therefore take their case to the British Empire, the CWPN already tried applying to Queen Elizabeth II for a pardon. Gotta admire their persistence.
(Hat tip to John Fea)